Caroline Overington reports on a Blairs Law moment, this time in the Federal Court.
Lawyers for AdultShop.com will argue that the federal Government’s Classification Review Board routinely applies an X-rating to sex films that would not offend a “reasonable adult”.
The review board is required to take “community standards” into account when classifying films.
The review board classifies most sex films as X18+, meaning they can be sold only in the ACT and Northern Territory and shown only in licensed premises in those territories.
Adultshop.com CEO Malcolm Day, whose publicly listed company is valued at $9 million, said standards had changed since the guidelines were drafted in 1984.
“Most reasonable adults would not regard an adult film, depicting sex between two consenting adults, with no violence, as offensive,” Mr Day said.
Sounds reasonable, and perfectly acceptable in a modern, secular and liberal society; why should images of a legal activity, undertaken by consenting adults be subject to restriction, or more to the point subject to any governmental interest whatsoever?
But then up bobs the pointy heads of God Botherers, lemon suckers, po-faced wowsers and the usual suspects who seek to inflict their own twisted view of morality on others:-
The Australian Family Association said today the court action was being driven by purely commercial reasons as the company attempted to increase its market share.
Association spokeswoman Angela Conway said AdultShop.com was attempting to undermine 20 years of consultation and debate that led to the X-rating being devised.
She said there was “every likelihood” that certain forms of violent erotica could also come under the R18+ rating.
“Some members of the Australian community are offended by this type of material, so we have to make sure they have a choice and they don’t have to have it in their faces when they walk into a video shop,” Ms Conway said.
“There is a risk that (if successful) this case will throw everything up in the air and we’ll go back to the 1980s where we had all sorts of problem with the mixing of porn and violence.”
Surely to make such a claim you need evidence, but not it seems when it’s an issue that’s supported by the legion of perpetual outrage (Y Chromosome Division), and what’s wrong with seeking to improve market share in a supposedly free market economy? You can’t be a Christian and a commie, Angie. Â
 Sheila Jeffries, associate professor of political science at the University of Melbourne, disagrees vehemently. “When people discuss pornography, what they forget is that they are watching the abuse of women,” she says.
“Do you know how long it takes to make one of these apparently non-violent films? It can take 12 hours.
“Women have to take double and triple penetration, they take pain killers and muscle relaxants, drugs, alcohol to disassociate, to help them cope. So what you are watching is not pornography. It is the abuse and prostitution of women. I would ask: do we want to make a big industry out of this in Australia?”
I believe the hourly rate is better than eviscerating chooks at Inghams, but seeing as it’s not compulsory to participate I don’t see how it’s any of your fucking business.Â
Which brings us to the point where Blairs Law comes into effect:-
Melinda Tankard Reist of the Women’s Forum Australia says pornography is essentially the abuse of women, and says tonight’s “so-called debate” has been stacked with pornography supporters. “They set these things up to make it look like only right-wing, Christian, conservative, pro-family groups have any opposition to pornography,” she says. “They ignore the voices of ordinary women who are opposed to the degradation of women in these films, for the pleasure primarily of men.
“There are women who could have been invited but weren’t — the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, for example, which works for women who are coerced into pornography. They are not invited to speak.
“Our own group — Women’s Forum Australia — we’re a broad group of women, quite normal women with very strong views because we’ve seen the toxic culture of this industry, we were not invited to speak.”
Tankard Reist says horrific tragedies, such as the death of Diane Brimble on a cruise ship, and the abuse of young girls in advertising “are all fuelled by an attitude that sees women as just pieces of meat. We are living in a brutal, over-sexualised culture, and excuse me, but some of us are trying to raise daughters in this environment, and the last thing we need is more pornography.”
Australian Family Association state president Angela Conway believes she’s the only conservative, anti-pornography campaigner on the panel.
Conway says: “I certainly have concerns about the impact of pornography on perceptions of women’s bodies, and women as people, and on relationships as a result.
“But let’s make no mistake about what AdultShop is trying to do with its court case. They are trying to pull the X-rated classification, saying these tapes should be available to everyone in every state.
“But X-rated material is already available and anybody in Australia who wants to get it can legally obtain that material by mail order.
“This is not an issue of availability. It’s about lumping adult films into the R category, so how long before they are in ordinary shops and cinemas?”
And so what if they do? If there’s a market for it, why is it any of your business? It’s not as if the Pervie Patrol is going to be roaming the streets, going door to door and forcing you out of your house at dildo-point to go and watch stick movies at some sleazy cinema- video killed off porn parlours years ago, and downloadable DVDs have given the hard-copy sale industry a major touch-up; these are all factors due to market change.
The real point here is the readiness of usually juxtaposed groups, who would not normally piss on each other if they were respectively onfire, to jump into bed (Oooerrr!!) with each other when they perceive a common cause. Â
UPDATE:- If you dirty bastards won’t give up porno for the sake of oppressed womyn and outraged religonazis, won’t you at least think of the ‘tards? Their new campaign puts up a pretty convincing case:-
Â
Â